It held then that a jurisdiction clause in an insurance contract cannot be relied upon against an insured who has not expressly subscribed to that clause and is domiciled in a State other than that of the policy-holder and the insurer.īALTA concerned an insurance contract covering ‘large risks’ within the meaning of the Solvency II Directive. The Court had addressed a similar issue in 2005, in the case of Société financière et industrielle du Peloux. On 27 February 2020 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling in BALTA, a case concerning the enforceability of choice-of-court clauses in insurance contracts (an English translation of the judgment was not available at the time of publishing this post). UPGRADE FROM ASSOCIATE TO ORDINARY MEMBERSHIP.THE EAPIL CONFERENCE IN AARHUS – 2-4 June 2022. Opportunities for Scholars from UKR, RUS and BLR.Working Group on the Law Applicable to Digital Assets.Working Group on the Reform of the Brussels I bis Regulation.Working Group on the Hague Convention and Protocol on Maintenance.Working Group on the International Protection of Adults.Working Group on International Property Law.Working Group on the Feasibility of a European Private International Law Act.The European Association of Private International Law Menu
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |